2016 UC Football Gets "F" Rating from USA Today

[Bearcat Chris]

The grade is based more upon where the program was at the end of the year, not just the won-loss record. Notre Dame and Michigan State also were in the group of seven schools that got F's.

Glad TT is gone. He set the program back 2-3 years, and probably cut fan interest and enthusiasm by 50%.

Next year is a new year, although it will be tough until LF's 2 or 3rd year.

http://www.cincinnati.com/story/spor...ts-f/96444460/

B.C.

[cpawstoney]

From what I've seen/heard so far, A bowl game next year won't surprise me. I think Coach Fickell can get us six wins from somewhere. To me, that would be a successful start.

[red_n_black_attack]

To be perfectly honest, TT should've receive an F minus or created a new level of fuTiliTy and given a G. His handling of the Kiel situation alone was bad enough, but what he did to our seniors is disgraceful. Purdue probably would've been a bowl team playing the same schedule and we beat them in their house before TT quit on the players, our fans, and our university. It's almost like whatever we had in the first couple games was a carryover from last year and TT quit some time over the offseason.

The players deserved better and gave better. The staff was flawed. Let's see where this team goes next season, but I am holding onto hope for a significant improvement.

[Lobot]

And here's a reason why he got an F. This is slightly infuriating.

http://www.cincinnati.com/story/spor...nati/96588802/

[red_n_black_attack]

Slightly???? TT was not even trying.

[BigDaddyCornHusker]

That article is disgusting. How did UC allow him to be here as long as he was??

[Lobot]

That article is disgusting. How did UC allow him to be here as long as he was??

Buyout was too big and the dept didn't have it. The CEO coach thing is pretty true if you like your CEO's to be clueless and completely out of touch with the company's workers.