INDEX BY:    DATE | THREAD | AUTHOR  
Previous Message:
Re: Rebounding problems
Next Message:
Re: different ways

Re: Darius Miller?



From: Michael Ryan
Date: 01 Feb 2007 - 09:20 PM EST

But I think you can ignore the one star players . . . .haha

We don't profess that the BearcatNews.com recruiting page is 100% accurate,
100% of the time, but we try. And I'd change the 5 to 1 system definitions
to "most likely" down to "less likely".

The 'no chance' players I place on the inactive list. I'm not always quick
with that though.
All you guys yell at me if I miss one or am slow.

Thanks for the vote of confidence.

--
Mike Ryan



On 2/1/07, address@hidden <address@hidden> wrote:

First, PLEASE ignore star and interest ratings from Scout or Rivals. They
are meaningless, often out of date, and sometimes just wrong.

Instead, use the Mike Ryan 1 to 5 system. From 5 (very likely) down to 1
(no chance). His numbers are accurate and up to date.

I think Florida leads UK and Tennessee for Miller with UC trailing those 3
at this point. Long way to go.

Tom Gray, UC since 1958 (when there were no stars or interest levals and
recruits signed in the summer before they entered UC that fall)

To subscribe, please follow the instructions here.