Re: Hrycaniuk Ruled Ineligible For 2006-07 Season

[Keith Wedinger]

I am sorry but I believe you are mistaken.  The final decision on their
eligibility did not come down until the appeals were heard and decided
upon.  It was no secret to anyone before the season started that both were
ineligible until the NCAA appeals process played through to its conclusion.
To suggest that Mick and/or the UC athletic staff was playing some smoke and
mirrors game to sell tickets is ridiculous.

On 12/6/06, address@hidden <address@hidden> wrote:
> In a message dated 12/5/2006 2:23:07 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> address@hidden writes:
>
>
> Now  that we get the whole story it seems very cut-and-dried to  me
>
>
>   Hall and Adam H were ruled ineligible by the NCAA months ago but
> UC  never
> put the word out. People were still buying tickets you know. The
> first  word
> from UC was they were waiting a decision from the NCAA. Then later
> UC  said it
> was a decision on an appeal for both players which meant the NCAA
> had  already
> ruled but UC never actually said that. Then it was they would know  next
> week. Then it was several we will know in 2 or 3 days plus Adam H
> would  maybe
> miss a few games, get to play half a season etc. etc.. Hall was ruled
> not  to
> play at all and Adam H was ruled not to play this season at  all months
> ago and
> that's the way it still is. All that stuff UC and Mick  put out was just
> smoke
> and mirrors. You will never hear any bad news about  a recruit from UC
> unless
> it's absolutely necessary. Just have to read between  the lines folks and
> that's a fact. Don


--
Keith Wedinger
Bearcatnews.com
Sciotofootball.com