Re: Hrycaniuk Ruled Ineligible For 2006-07 Season

[Saffell, Charles J MM1 NAVSUBSCOL]

What good does it do to tell everyone that we wouldn't have these guys?
Do you honestly think that by not telling people what was going on would
really affect ticket sales THAT much?  You are right that we will never
hear bad news unless it is absolutely necessary because that is the way
it should be.  

-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden
[mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of address@hidden
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 8:48
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [UC Basketball] Hrycaniuk Ruled Ineligible For 2006-07
Season

 
In a message dated 12/5/2006 2:23:07 P.M. Central Standard Time,
address@hidden writes:


Now  that we get the whole story it seems very cut-and-dried to  me


  Hall and Adam H were ruled ineligible by the NCAA months ago but UC
never put the word out. People were still buying tickets you know. The
first  word from UC was they were waiting a decision from the NCAA. Then
later UC  said it was a decision on an appeal for both players which
meant the NCAA had  already ruled but UC never actually said that. Then
it was they would know  next week. Then it was several we will know in 2
or 3 days plus Adam H would  maybe miss a few games, get to play half a
season etc. etc.. Hall was ruled not  to play at all and Adam H was
ruled not to play this season at  all months ago and that's the way it
still is. All that stuff UC and Mick  put out was just smoke and
mirrors. You will never hear any bad news about  a recruit from UC
unless it's absolutely necessary. Just have to read between  the lines
folks and that's a fact. Don