INDEX BY:    DATE | THREAD | AUTHOR  

Re: Hrycaniuk Ruled Ineligible For 2006-07 Season



From: MC72642
Date: 06 Dec 2006 - 08:48 AM EST


In a message dated 12/5/2006 2:23:07 P.M. Central Standard Time,
address@hidden writes:


Now that we get the whole story it seems very cut-and-dried to me


Hall and Adam H were ruled ineligible by the NCAA months ago but UC never
put the word out. People were still buying tickets you know. The first word
from UC was they were waiting a decision from the NCAA. Then later UC said it
was a decision on an appeal for both players which meant the NCAA had already
ruled but UC never actually said that. Then it was they would know next
week. Then it was several we will know in 2 or 3 days plus Adam H would maybe
miss a few games, get to play half a season etc. etc.. Hall was ruled not to
play at all and Adam H was ruled not to play this season at all months ago and
that's the way it still is. All that stuff UC and Mick put out was just smoke
and mirrors. You will never hear any bad news about a recruit from UC unless
it's absolutely necessary. Just have to read between the lines folks and
that's a fact. Don
Follow Ups:
Re: Hrycaniuk Ruled Ineligible For 2006-07 Season, Saffell, Charles J MM1 NAVSUBSCOL
Re: Hrycaniuk Ruled Ineligible For 2006-07 Season, Keith Wedinger

To subscribe, please follow the instructions here.