Re: Hrycaniuk Ruled Ineligible For 2006-07 Season

[Brent Wyrick]

He was ruled ineligible I believe. I know he had his case reviewed.

-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden
[mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of Adam Osterholt
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 6:59 PM
To: UC Basketball Forum
Subject: Re: [UC Basketball] Hrycaniuk Ruled Ineligible For 2006-07 Season

Was Thabeet from UCONN originally ruled ineligible and overturned or
did they rule he was eligible from the start?

On 12/5/06, Joshua Rexhausen <address@hidden> wrote:
> When was the last time anyone won an appeal from the NCAA?  Has it ever
> happened?
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: John T. Hall <address@hidden>
> To: UC Basketball Forum <address@hidden>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 5, 2006 4:09:07 PM
> Subject: Re: [UC Basketball] Hrycaniuk Ruled Ineligible For 2006-07 Season
>
>
> I agree no harm done, except possibly alienating some fans who got
> their hopes up and now might feel they've been mislead. It certainly
> seemed from Mick's comments there was some chance Adam might win the
> appeal.
>
>                 - John in SD
>
> On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Jon Macomber wrote:
>
> > With Adam and Hernol it seems now that it was very obvious they would be
> > ineligible, but it was worth an attempt to maybe get some sympathy from
> the
> > NCAA.
> >
> > It was fool's gold the whole time.  But maybe worth a long shot
> considering
> > the circumstances.  I think we got screwed on Herrera last year, but
can't
> > fault the NCAA on these two.
> >
> > Oh well, worth a shot.  Too bad for Hernol and Adam though.  Hope they
can
> > get something positive out of the experience.  At least Adam will be
able
> to
> > play 1 year of Div 1 ball and maybe Hernol can "practice" his way to get
> some
> > pro looks in the spring.
> >
> > Jon
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "John T. Hall" <address@hidden>
> > To: <address@hidden>
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 3:22 PM
> > Subject: Re: [UC Basketball] Hrycaniuk Ruled Ineligible For 2006-07
Season
> > > Now that we get the whole story it seems very cut-and-dried to me.
Unless
> > > there was some dispute as to whether his teammates were paid above
living
> > > expenses I can't see how Mick could have had any hope with the appeal.
If
> > > anything, we're lucky he still has one year of eligibility. Hope he
> sticks
> > > around.
> > >
> > >  - John in SD
> > >
> > > On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Keith Wedinger wrote:
> > >
> > > > Link to the announcement from UC is on Bearcatnews.com.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Keith Wedinger
> > > > Bearcatnews.com
> > > > Sciotofootball.com
____________________________________________________________________________
________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
> http://new.mail.yahoo.com