Re: Only an exhbition, but.........

[Dan Marshall]

I agree with this assesment as well.. I just didn't want to harp on it to
much and be negative about the team :) 

-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden
[mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of Jonathan Breiner
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 7:44 AM
To: UC Basketball Forum
Subject: Re: [UC Basketball] Only an exhbition, but.........

I was very impressed overall, but agree with your assessment below. 
Williamson has the scoring mentality.  He just had a knack for getting to
the basket, and even looked good on his 3-pointer mid-first half.

How did you like the uniforms?  I liked them quite a bit actually.  I'll be
curious to see the black ones (and red ones?).

Jon



----- Original Message -----
From: "Bearcat Tom" <address@hidden>
To: <address@hidden>
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 10:49 PM
Subject: Re: [UC Basketball] Only an exhbition, but.........


> NKU was horrible.  I can't believe Cripe was the same player who dominated

> the same gym a year ago.
>
> Williamson is a scorer.  Warren is a definite starter.  Of course Ced is 
> the best player.  I'll predict at least one of those guys will be 2nd team

> All BE.  Adam and Hernoll are sorely needed to compete w/ the upper half 
> of the BE.  Otherwise, the team is 7 deep.
>
> Sikes is a question mark.
>
> Ronald Allen looks like he put on some weight but is still not a quality 
> player.  He almost fouled out.
> Crowell needs to push the ball.
>
> A lot of the screen sets were vintage Pitino.  Mick looked very 
> comfortable on the bench.
>
> Bottom line this team will play hard but given the schedule do not expect 
> the NCAA...NIT is very possible.
>
> Last point, you can get to the west side of 5/3 directly now by going up 
> the stairs next to the recreation center.
>
> Tom
>
> > From: "Nathan Allen" <address@hidden>
> > Reply-To: UC Basketball Forum <address@hidden>
> > To: "UC Basketball Forum" <address@hidden>
> > Subject: Re: [UC Basketball] Only an exhbition, but.........
> > Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 22:30:17 -0500
> >
> > I'm not a doom and gloomer.  I am very excited for the Cronin era.  I 
> > think
> > that at the end of the day, UC will be better off (on numerous levels) for
> > getting rid of Huggins - although I disagree with how the situation was
> > handled.
> >
> > That said, NKU is a division II team (and not a good one this year at
> > that).  Nice for the guys to go up against some other players, but let's
> > see how they do when they tee it up against some division 1 schools.  I
> > would not say this is a "problem," but, again, we are talking about a D2
> > team . . .
> >
> >
> > On 11/1/06, Jeff Tompkins <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > Looks like there might some hope for this year. I just can't wait for
> > > all you "doom and gloomers" to get started. Anybody want to predict what
> > > the problem with this game is going to be?
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Stay in touch with old friends and meet new ones with Windows Live Spaces 
http://clk.atdmt.com/MSN/go/msnnkwsp0070000001msn/direct/01/?href=http://spa
ces.live.com/spacesapi.aspx?wx_action=create&wx_url=/friends.aspx&mkt=en-us
>