Re: Hall and Adam H.

[Michael Ryan]

John, yes you are correct . . .
I was speaking of a bigger picture - not necessarily the 'why', just the
(possible) result.
We heard Abdul would be eligible 'soon' and soon never came.

--
Mike Ryan


On 11/1/06, John T. Hall <address@hidden> wrote:
> But wasn't Herrera's issue academics? Some class that didn't count
> towards his core credits? With the current guys I thought the problem was
> that they played for club teams in their home countries. Which is true of
> pretty much every international player. Is this why we're seeing fewer
> foreign players in college these days?
>
>                                         - John in SD
>
> On Wed, 1 Nov 2006, Michael Ryan wrote:
>
> > It cant be UC's fault over the years, since the administration is
> seemingly
> > new from the AD to the Team Managers over the last 12 Months.
> >
> > Hey John Hall . . . Precedent = Herrera, is my guess.
> >
> > What I keep hearing is anywhere from 5-10 games for each of our big men,
> but
> > I also heard similar things for Abdul last season, so whaddya gonna do.
> >
> > --
> > Mike Ryan
> >
> >
> >
> > On 11/1/06, Shawn Hunter <address@hidden> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Mick made mention this morning that Adam's case was in appeal which
> is a
> >> > very bad sign and Hernol's case "would take and hour to explain"
> which
> >> > didn't sound good either.
> >>
> >> So while I believe that 90% of the blame for this and similar
> eligibility
> >> situations falls on the inept NCAA, I also feel that the recent
> frequency
> >> of
> >> such situations @ UC suggests some bit of mishandling on UC's part.  Is
> >> someone not doing their homework here to make sure these kids are
> >> eligible?
> >>
> >> Very frustrating...
> >> Shawn
> >>
> >