INDEX BY:    DATE | THREAD | AUTHOR  

Re: Hall and Adam H.



From: Michael Ryan
Date: 01 Nov 2006 - 10:11 PM EST

It cant be UC's fault over the years, since the administration is seemingly
new from the AD to the Team Managers over the last 12 Months.

Hey John Hall . . . Precedent = Herrera, is my guess.

What I keep hearing is anywhere from 5-10 games for each of our big men, but
I also heard similar things for Abdul last season, so whaddya gonna do.

--
Mike Ryan



On 11/1/06, Shawn Hunter <address@hidden> wrote:

> Mick made mention this morning that Adam's case was in appeal which is a
> very bad sign and Hernol's case "would take and hour to explain" which
> didn't sound good either.

So while I believe that 90% of the blame for this and similar eligibility
situations falls on the inept NCAA, I also feel that the recent frequency
of
such situations @ UC suggests some bit of mishandling on UC's part. Is
someone not doing their homework here to make sure these kids are
eligible?

Very frustrating...
Shawn

Follow Ups:
Re: Hall and Adam H., John T. Hall
Re: Hall and Adam H., dfairchild

To subscribe, please follow the instructions here.