Re: Cronin II

[Nathan Allen]

I dunno - I think that landing Mayo or Walker, even if for only a year or
two, would have been huge.  Would have sent the message to the rest of the
Big East (and more importantly, to high school prospects) that Cronin means
business and that Clifton is a place where five star recruits want to play.


On 10/27/06, Dan Marshall <address@hidden> wrote:
> Jon,...
>
> I agree now Mayo etc wouldn't be a good choice... I am talking about just
> wishing it were all back the way it was...
>
> Huggins with 2 more years on his contract... Big east, National
> Championship
> etc etc etc
>
> I know now it wouldn't be good, but I'm thinking of all that was thrown
> away... And for what?  Old news.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of Jonathan Breiner
> Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 11:42 AM
> To: UC Basketball Forum
> Subject: Re: [UC Basketball] Cronin II
>
> But what about after that one year?  We would have 8 or 9 players all
> leaving the same year?  Cronin needs to balance the classes and build for
> the long term.  Maybe if either of these guys had a thought about going to
> UC it would be worth it, but they have had no interest in UC for quite
> some
> time now and why waste time recruiting people who don't want to be there
> to
> totally mess up your class distribution.  And the question would be would
> one or both of these players make THE difference.  Maybe, not sure.  too
> big
> of a risk for too low of a percentage of a reward for me.  I think Cronin
> will be able to build a solid-sustained program so I am willing to take a
> lump or two now instead of having to rebuild again in 2 years.
>
> Jon
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <address@hidden>
> To: "UC Basketball Forum" <address@hidden>
> Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 11:37 AM
> Subject: Re: [UC Basketball] Cronin II
>
>
> >I feel the same way...................one year is better then no year!!!!
> > Glenn
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Dan Marshall" <address@hidden>
> > To: "'UC Basketball Forum'" <address@hidden>
> > Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 11:30 AM
> > Subject: Re: [UC Basketball] Cronin II
> >
> >
> >>
> >> I also hear Bill Walker cleared the clearing house for Kansas State...
> > I
> >> don't care if he is One and Done I would love to have him and mayo
> >> hear...
> >> :(
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: address@hidden
> >> [mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of Mike Rucker
> >> Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 9:30 PM
> >> To: UC Basketball Forum
> >> Subject: Re: [UC Basketball] Cronin II
> >>
> >> N - No
> >> C - Cincinnati
> >> A - Athletes
> >> A - Allowed
> >>
> >> Isn't that the truth. Wasn't Thabeet just cleared to play for Uconn?
> Why
> > do
> >> I get the feeling that if Hernol or Adam played for.....say, Uconn that
> > they
> >> would be eligible and ready to go!  It seems like UC ALWAYS goes
> through
> >> this crap. Very frustrating!!
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: <address@hidden>
> >> To: <address@hidden>
> >> Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 5:31 PM
> >> Subject: Re: [UC Basketball] Cronin II
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> > In a message dated 10/25/2006 10:27:16 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> >> > address@hidden writes:
> >> >
> >> > I have a  feeling that Adam and Hernol will not be eligible.
> >> > . . .and this is Mick's  way of letting us down easy.
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Mike  Ryan
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Say it isn't so, if we lose both of them for the season we will be
> > forced
> >> to
> >> > endure another season of guards and forwards trying to overachieve.
> >> >
> >> > N - No
> >> > C - Cincinnati
> >> > A - Athletes
> >> > A - Allowed
> >> >
> >> > Logan
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> an
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >