INDEX BY:    DATE | THREAD | AUTHOR  

Re: C-Paw, Mascot, Team



From: joebodner
Date: 17 Oct 2006 - 03:20 PM EST

I like the new logo. It is cleaner and sharper than the old logo. Now
when I see the old logo it seems soft and cartoonish.



----- Original Message -----
From: Justin Register <address@hidden>
Date: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 1:48 pm
Subject: Re: [UC Basketball] C-Paw, Mascot, Team
To: UC Basketball Forum <address@hidden>

I also like the new one much more. I agree that it looks cleaner.
And
hell, it gives me a good excuse to buy more UC gear!

On 10/17/06, Saffell, Charles J MM1 NAVSUBSCOL
<address@hidden>wrote:

When they first introduced the new C-Paw I wasn't real sure
about it. It
has now grown on me and I actually like it more than the old
one. It has a
cleaner look than the old style.

-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden [mailto:
address@hidden On Behalf Of Keith Wedinger
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 13:32
To: UC Basketball Forum
Subject: Re: [UC Basketball] C-Paw, Mascot, Team

I don't think these opinions on the new logo and the new mascot are
universal. You are certainly free to not purchase new UC gear
if you don't
like the new look. But, I suspect that there are others who
feel just the
opposite.

On 10/17/06, Bearcat Fan <address@hidden> wrote:

What is up with this administration and changing things?????

New C-Paw = UGLY
New Mascot = UGLY

I still plan on supporting the team and going to games but I
am not
buying new UC gear (especially the adidas crap). We went from
having a
great logo and a perfectly fine mascot to having junk. tOSU
just got
my sports gear money officially.


---------------------------------
Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls.
Great
rates starting at 1¢/min.




--
Keith Wedinger
Bearcatnews.com
Sciotofootball.com





To subscribe, please follow the instructions here.