Re: C-Paw, Mascot, Team

[Zahid Siddiqi]

So we can have an opinion, as long it is yours?  I thought this was the type of forum to discuss these issues.  As another member already stated, there are those who hate it and those who like it.  The two sides will just have to agree to disagree.

Kris Rose <address@hidden> wrote:  the new c-paw is stupid, it's the old logo in italics and the mascot is 
HIDEOUS, this shouldn't be up for debate.

people might want to take a step back about the jerseys though. no one has 
seen them yet and we might get lucky not to have nike. at least we have a 
shot at a unique design as opposed to the garbage nike is putting out there 
(take a look at ohio state, kansas state and florida for examples...the same 
ugly jersey in different colors).


> From: "Keith Wedinger" 
> Reply-To: UC Basketball Forum 
> To: "UC Basketball Forum" 
> Subject: Re: [UC Basketball] C-Paw, Mascot, Team
> Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 13:32:03 -0400
>
> I don't think these opinions on the new logo and the new mascot are
> universal. You are certainly free to not purchase new UC gear if you don't
> like the new look. But, I suspect that there are others who feel just the
> opposite.
>
> On 10/17/06, Bearcat Fan wrote:
> > What is up with this administration and changing things?????
> >
> > New C-Paw = UGLY
> > New Mascot = UGLY
> >
> > I still plan on supporting the team and going to games but I am not
> > buying new UC gear (especially the adidas crap). We went from having a 
> > great
> > logo and a perfectly fine mascot to having junk. tOSU just got my sports
> > gear money officially.
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls. Great
> > rates starting at 1¢/min.
>
>
>
> --
> Keith Wedinger
> Bearcatnews.com
> Sciotofootball.com