Re: Raising the level of conversation

[richard l. kandell]

I had no problems with the post - it was a good one - I just don't have any
answers to the questions.  :-)

Richard K
.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "dfairchild" <address@hidden>
To: "UC Basketball Forum" <address@hidden>
Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2006 7:22 PM
Subject: [UC Basketball] Raising the level of conversation


Help!?

I'm trying to figure out the dynamics of the forum.

A couple of days ago, I made a post that was strictly about the basketball
program.  I raised the question about the issues (questions), the
program/Cronin needs to answer for this season.  I listed over 10 important
basketball questions (see below).  The post was largely ignored.  (The lack
of response may just be a sign of the sure genius of the post and everyone
agreed with it; but some how I doubt that.)

In contrast, any little slight either way in the Huggins v.
Zimpher/administration debate creates a firestorm of posts.  Some of these
posts even come from people who complain about the tit for tat level of
conversation.

So which is it?  Is the goal of the forum a substantial discussion of the UC
basketball program?  Or, is that just a facade and the purpose is merely a
space for rants?

Go Cats!
DF

This year, there are so many unknowns, that I'm not even sure I know the
questions for this year.
How will Coach Cronin make the adjustment from Murray State to UC?
What type of talent have we recruited to go alongside of McGowan?
What type of year will McGowan have without Hicks beside him?
Who will be the point guard?
Who will play center?
Who will play on the wings?
> From where will our points come?
What style will we play?
What type of depth will we have?
Who will ultimately make our rotation? What will it look like?
How many minutes will each player get?

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.407 / Virus Database: 268.12.12/461 - Release Date: 10/2/2006