Re: Time Warner is not the problem

[Dan Marshall]

It wasn't a disireable position to be in.   They had to pay him that much.
(I don't believe the I'd have coached for free comments) 

-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden
[mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of address@hidden
Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2006 5:38 PM
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [UC Basketball] Time Warner is not the problem

 
In a message dated 10/3/2006 3:41:37 P.M. Central Standard Time,
address@hidden writes:

Some of  us have limited incomes.....and when they started that policy, the
football  team was pitiful.




Speaking of incomes Mick' salary is 900 thousand a year.  Think you could
afford tickets if you made that much? Huggin's salary was 700  thousand a
year for a guy that had 14 straight NCAA trips and hundred's of wins.  I
never could figure out why they paid Mick so much. He would have taken the
job  for 600 thousand a year in a heartbeat I think. Anybody have any ideal
why he  got that much? Don