INDEX BY:    DATE | THREAD | AUTHOR  

Re: Time Warner is not the problem



From: Dan Marshall
Date: 03 Oct 2006 - 02:45 PM EST

It's because they MADE us buy football :)

-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden
[mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of Keith Wedinger
Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2006 2:38 PM
To: UC Basketball Forum
Subject: Re: [UC Basketball] Time Warner is not the problem

Before someone chimes in with, "we don't sell out because Huggins is not the
coach", let me remind everyone that UC has not regularly sold out 5/3 Arena
since Kenyon Martin's senior season. That's almost 6 years ago.

I know that their have been several threads on this forum discussing why
this is so (i.e. why don't fans come out to the games). Many have focused
on the uncomfortable bench seats in the upper deck which is certainly a
contributing factor. I think the widespread TV coverage of the Bearcats is
also a contributing factor (why go to the game and spend $100 to $200 on
tickets and concessions when I can watch the game at home). Another factor
is the lack of big name opponents during the non-conference schedule. It is
tough to get excited about playing directional schools.

On 10/3/06, Holdheide, Brad <address@hidden> wrote:

13,000 is not the problem. The real problem lies with actually
getting people to the games and selling out the arena. Complain all
you want about seating quality and such, Syracuse puts over 22,000
people in their arena every game and the nose bleed seats there are
much worse than anything at UC.

If UC sold out every game to average 13,176 that would put them 16th
overall across the country and only behind 2 Big East teams, Syracuse
and UConn (barely behind UConn). A packed house of 13,000+ fans who
are loud and raucous to go along with our practice facilities is more
than enough to impress a top recruit. But what we have is 11,000 fans
who only get loud for 1 or 2 big games a year.

I say the fans are to blame, not the arena.


-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden
[mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of Dan Marshall
Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2006 2:19 PM
To: 'UC Basketball Forum'
Subject: Re: [UC Basketball] Time Warner is not the problem

I realize the practice facilities are top notch... (although our guys
should be in class not doing extra practice...)

But still, if I'm a player... 13,000? 30,000?

-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden
[mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of Tom Carter
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 11:00 PM
To: UC Basketball Forum
Subject: Re: [UC Basketball] Time Warner is not the problem

I'm sorry to have to challenge your statement that we only have our
13,000 plus multi-purpose facility, having spent several hours
touring "The Richard Lindner Center" I can tell you this facility is a
world class facility and that 4 floors below the "green space" between
the baseball field and Nippert is a full court basketball court
facility that Mick loves and the kids will use regularly. This
athletic facility is second to none, in or out of the big east!

Bob was given a chance and we are better for it and we should stand
by this team and coach Cronin and things might just work out! Not
without some hiccups to be sure, but with the thought that it's a new
era and this team, head coach and the university should get our
support! It has mine!

Tom Carter, a bearcat fan since 1960!

Dan Marshall <address@hidden> wrote:
The point is this, you have to remember now we compete with all the
other Big East teams for recruiting, before we only really competed
with the CUSA teams for the Non All Americans... We barely won in
that, now we compete with the big guys,

I don't know how someone can think that a first year coach with a
Small arena, and limited nat tv coverage can compete with Syracuse,
UCONN, Louisville, et al.

It doesn't make sense to say that we have an advantage... Before we
had the advantage of being at the top of our league, the mid to bottom
of the league will not get better recruits than the top of the CUSA...
All the good ones will choose a Big East team that offers more.

Also what "New 'physincilities' (I assume you mean facilities) Do we
have for Basketball? It's the same 13,000+ Multi purpose arena.

What's tiresome is blind optimism, I'm interested in a solution as
well, but blind, ignore the facts optimism will not get us to a
solution

-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden
[mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of
address@hidden
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 12:20 PM
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [UC Basketball] Time Warner is not the problem


In a message dated 9/28/2006 4:39:37 PM Eastern Standard Time,
address@hidden writes:

It's going to be a lot more difficult to "rebuild" in the Big east
than it was in CUSA


Disagree totally, new physicilities everywhere, one of the top 3
basketball conferences in the country, good, young, well respected
basketball coach that has proven for years he can recruit with anyone.
I think he did well this year with a couple weeks to work with. In the
next couple years he will bring in big time recruits.
I hated what happened to Coach Huggins and thought for sure he would
get an opportunity to coach in the Big East but, much of the off court
problems (his and his players) were his responsibility. His removal
for image problems is not a surprise to many in the know. The die-hard
"we won't be sh--t without Huggins" and it's all Zimpher's fault is
very tiresome.

Logan












--
Keith Wedinger
Bearcatnews.com
Sciotofootball.com




To subscribe, please follow the instructions here.