Previous Message:
Re: time warner not the problem
Re: time warner not the problem
Next Message:
Re: time warner not the problem
Re: time warner not the problem
Re: Time Warner is not the problem
From: GRagle513
Date: 02 Oct 2006 - 03:36 AM EST
Date: 02 Oct 2006 - 03:36 AM EST
In a message dated 9/28/06 1:33:11 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
address@hidden writes:
I am going to get a GREAT deal of pleasure out of telling those who think UC
was destroyed, "I told you so" when UC is:
1. Surprisingly competitive this season
2. Back on the national scene and seriously competing for the Big East
title next season
If these don't happen, I will gladly eat my words.
Uh Keith.....I didn't think you were like that, at least not in here, maybe
in usenet in the past years. That 'almost' sounded vindictive. ;-) I won't be
surprised to see UC be 'competitive' this year, but that is so sad to even
have to say that isn't it? *Surprisingly competitive*
On your #2 do you care to put a small $200 wager on that? Of course I would
want to know what you mean by 'seriously competing' .....Don can hold our
money :-D, it would be fun because I only bet on SURE things. I know what I call
seriously competing but I have a feeling your standards may be a tad lower
than they used to be because things are 'different'.
**Sorry for all my posts, because as some have said in here, things ARE
different now and I only read my UC mail once maybe twice a week which is sad in
itself considering I used to monitor the forum all of my waking hours. I get
more done now which is the only good IMO that has come out of all this.
gregg
To subscribe, please follow the instructions here.


