INDEX BY:    DATE | THREAD | AUTHOR  

Re: Sensible solution - was TW not the prob.



From: dfairchild
Date: 01 Oct 2006 - 09:01 PM EST

Darren,

I believe this conversation began when the news was released that the UC-XU
game will not be available in Cincy for most fans - only those with ESPNU.
The argument is whether this would have happened if Huggins was still here.
Some have pointed out the strange coincidence between UC losing nationally
television games and KSU gaining them: this phenomenon is most readily seen
in the fact that while the UC-XU game will not be on ESPN or ESPN2, the
KSU-XU game will be on ESPN2.

It may not be related to Huggins at all. For me, it seems clear that ESPN
puts competive teams on their premier networks. It is their judgment for
this upcoming year - KSU will be more competitive than UC, but until we play
the games, we won't know. Despite the denial on this board, the reality is
that the external judgment of UC basketball at this time is that it is at
the same level as South Florida!

Finally, I think we are lucky that UC is Mick's dream job. If it wasn't, we
would have Sidney Lowe!

Go Cats!
DF

Go Cats!
DF

-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden
[mailto:address@hidden Behalf Of Darren Sloppy
Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2006 8:40 PM
To: 'UC Basketball Forum'
Subject: Re: [UC Basketball] Sensible solution - was TW not the prob.


Correction, He was the coach of UC Basketball. There was basketball before
him and there will be basketball after him. How many NC has he won? I
guarantee you that if you ask if he is UC basketball he will say no. He is
no longer here why can people not get over that? From the sounds of some of
the posts they didn't follow UC basketball they only followed a coach. The
name on the front of the jersey is more important than the name on the back!

-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden
[mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of address@hidden
Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2006 6:42 PM
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [UC Basketball] Sensible solution - was TW not the prob.


In a message dated 10/1/2006 9:53:01 A.M. Central Standard Time,
address@hidden writes:

I didn't want to mention the name, But if you look at their TV schedule,
they have better coverage than us, those of you that said it had nothing to
do with Huggins, I just wanted to make that point, frankly I really hadn't
seen that school on TV before huggins went there.




I think I read KS hadn't been on ESPN for the last 3 years. Of course it
was
all about Huggins. The Knight, Huggins game on ESPN was like automatic. For

a clincher the KS, XU game is on ESPN 2 and of course the only reason is
Huggins. The UC, XU game that has been on ESPN for like the last 6 or 7
years was
taken off. KS is big in the eyes of ESPN right now. Anyone who thinks
Huggins didn't bring ESPN to KS is in self denial. There will be as many or
more UC
fans watching KS this year as UC. He is still UC basketball in this city
for
the time being. Nobody has replaced the name as yet. Don

--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.407 / Virus Database: 268.12.10/459 - Release Date: 9/29/2006


--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.407 / Virus Database: 268.12.10/459 - Release Date: 9/29/2006




--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.407 / Virus Database: 268.12.10/459 - Release Date: 9/29/2006

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.407 / Virus Database: 268.12.10/459 - Release Date: 9/29/2006



To subscribe, please follow the instructions here.