Previous Message:
What to discuss?
What to discuss?
Next Message:
Re: Sensible solution - was TW not the prob.
Re: Sensible solution - was TW not the prob.
Re: Sensible solution - was TW not the prob.
From: MC72642
Date: 01 Oct 2006 - 06:42 PM EST
Date: 01 Oct 2006 - 06:42 PM EST
In a message dated 10/1/2006 9:53:01 A.M. Central Standard Time,
address@hidden writes:
I didn't want to mention the name, But if you look at their TV schedule,
they have better coverage than us, those of you that said it had nothing to
do with Huggins, I just wanted to make that point, frankly I really hadn't
seen that school on TV before huggins went there.
I think I read KS hadn't been on ESPN for the last 3 years. Of course it was
all about Huggins. The Knight, Huggins game on ESPN was like automatic. For
a clincher the KS, XU game is on ESPN 2 and of course the only reason is
Huggins. The UC, XU game that has been on ESPN for like the last 6 or 7 years was
taken off. KS is big in the eyes of ESPN right now. Anyone who thinks
Huggins didn't bring ESPN to KS is in self denial. There will be as many or more UC
fans watching KS this year as UC. He is still UC basketball in this city for
the time being. Nobody has replaced the name as yet. Don
- Follow Ups:
- Re: Sensible solution - was TW not the prob., Justin Register
- Re: Sensible solution - was TW not the prob., Darren Sloppy
To subscribe, please follow the instructions here.


