INDEX BY:    DATE | THREAD | AUTHOR  

Re: West Virginia



From: LaDon Aridge
Date: 01 Feb 2006 - 03:46 PM EST

Hicks is way too valuable in the paint, I think you'll probably see McGowan matched up in man. I don't see a zone working on Pittsnogle any better. with his size he can shoot over the guards pretty easily.

It may be a situation where you concede Pittsnogle 20 and hope he doesn't get 35, while you work on guarding the rest of the team. UC could really use a signature win over one or two of their remaining opponents. Right now their best wins are Marquette, LSU, and Vanderbilt...none of those teams are locks at the moment.

address@hidden wrote:
Earlier in the year I was thinking: boy Kirkland is going to get burnt on the back door cut at least 5 times when they play WV. Don't have to worry about that now. If UC plays man defense it will be worse. Pittsnogle will take Hicks outside and WV guards will take UC's guards inside and get lay ups. Even though WV shoots the 3 well I think the only chance UC has is to play zone. Andy if you read this and play man it's going to be a long night. Don




---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
With a free 1 GB, there's more in store with Yahoo! Mail.
Follow Ups:
RE: West Virginia, Brent Wyrick

To subscribe, please follow the instructions here.