Re: Tilford vs. Moore

[dmuc2000]

Great points.  Completely agree.
 
Tilford should come in when need to get a scoring streak.  He can knock down some 3's and free up Hicks to operate and Downey to penetrate.
 
Well explained Jon. 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: jon breiner <address@hidden>
To: address@hidden
Sent: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 09:48:00 -0500
Subject: Re: [UC Basketball] Tilford vs. Moore


But remember, the ONLY part of TIlford's game that is better than Moore's is shooting.  Moore played the 1, 2, and 3 last night.  Can you imagine Tilford guarding a 6'7" guy in the post?  Moore did a great job doing it.  He's also a much better passer and all-around defender.  
 
But why does it have to be one or the other.  I think Tilford needs more time because he is probably this team's best shooter, but that does not mean we can do without Moore's contributions.  Perhaps this thread should be Allen vs. Moore, and then we can wonder why a 6'1" guard outplays a 6'9" guy at SF.
 
Jon
 
 
----- Original Message ----- 
From: address@hidden 
To: address@hidden 
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 9:05 AM
Subject: Re: [UC Basketball] Tilford vs. Moore


I agree with you........for Moore we need to start a statistic air balls shot,,,,,,,,,,,,it must be his back!!!!
Glenn
----- Original Message ----- 
From: address@hidden 
To: address@hidden 
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 11:05 PM
Subject: Re: [UC Basketball] Tilford vs. Moore


 And yeah, yeah...again...Chadd has a bad back.  Whatever. Who cares.  The point is...he sucks.  Tilford maybe a PG, but he can shoot decent.  At least better than Moore. 
 
Really, look at the situation.  Teams pack it down on Hicks and force us to shoot outside.  If Chadd can't make them.  Put in someone who can.  Tilford looks like his shot is a lot better than Moore's.