INDEX BY:    DATE | THREAD | AUTHOR  

RE: Even Calipari wants fans to show up for Memphis game.



From: Dan Marshall
Date: 02 Dec 2005 - 01:44 PM EST

so look at that 2 Million donation as a 8 Million loss.

_____

From: Saffell, Charles J MM1 NAVSUBSCOL [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 1:38 PM
To: address@hidden
Subject: RE: [UC Basketball] Even Calipari wants fans to show up for Memphis
game.


The original Schott donation was originally supposed to be $10 million.

-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 13:30
To: address@hidden
Subject: RE: [UC Basketball] Even Calipari wants fans to show up for Memphis
game.



The problem I see is that the contributions are not visually down. From an
out of towner looking in it seems that the large donations - the ones that
are seen in the public - are going up. Maybe that is a false impression I
have due to the Schott one being yesterday; however, the news doesn't report
your or my couple of thousand - they report the 2 million.



I want the program to do well. I fall in the alumni trying to give back
department, but I also know that without athletic success even the most
dedicated alumni will either lose interest or support. I wish I knew a way
to do that and hopefully that is what the new AD will be able to accomplish.




_____


From: Mike Brungs [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 1:10 PM
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [UC Basketball] Even Calipari wants fans to show up for Memphis
game.



This is indeed a much discussed issue on this board so I will keep my

comment brief.



Not that ANYTHING is going to move the presiden/BOT but I would say

a half empty arena makes a big statement. Decreased contributions

make a big statement.



The same "you should go to support the players" argument was made

about the Bengals in the 90's. Not until the stadium was half empty

did a change finally occur.



Again, I am not naive enough to think that we can "push" them. I do believe


this though. If the seats are filled... there is much less reason for them
to

do ANYTHING different.



Mike

Brent Wyrick <address@hidden> wrote:

There is a link to the Post article on the Bearcatnews.com page. There is
also an Enquirer article. In a nutshell he surmises that no one is hurting
the administration and BOT and everyone is hurting the players by not being
there for games. Personally I agree with him although I know not everyone on
here shares my opinion.



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

To subscribe, please follow the instructions here.