RE: Huggs and our Next Coach
Re: RE: Huggs and our Next Coach
Re: RE: Huggs and our Next Coach
Date: 16 Nov 2005 - 01:39 PM EST
I really don't see how not attending games is not supporting the team. Why must I throw money at a failed administration to watch live performances of a team when I feel very comfortable supporting strongly the team from in front of a TV screen at BWW or some other establishment? I assume that your requirement for supporting the team means that you will be present in the stands for every game throughout the entire season, and have attended the prior two games as well. If this is not the case, I guess you just don't care then.
And how is poor attendance justification for firing Huggins. That appears to be a contradictory statement. According to the evil one, DZ, firing Huggins was supposed to improve the program, not destroy it.
FWIW.
Bill Bates
Bearcat Boxers
5532 Dry Run Rd.
Milford, OH 45150
513-404-4647
address@hidden
www.bearcatboxers.com
> adminsitration are two separate issues. Supporting the team does
> not, in any way, support the administration. And it is quite easy
> to reconcile one's position of supporting the team and not
> supporting the adminsitration. In fact, supporting THIS team
> would be a statement in opposition to the adminsitration.
> Remember all those derogatory comments Dr. Z's puppet lawyer made
> about THIS team? She used THIS team as an example of what the
> administration despised about Huggins' program and grounds for not
> extending his contract. To turn your back on THIS team would show
> that you agree with the administration's view of the team. After
> the season, the administration will point to lower attendance as
> justification for its decision regarding Huggins.
>
>
> Zahid H. Siddiqi
> Atto! rney at L
To subscribe, please follow the instructions here.
