INDEX BY:    DATE | THREAD | AUTHOR  

RE: Re: Tranghese



From: Dan Marshall
Date: 02 Jul 2005 - 12:59 PM EST

LOL AMEN BOB...I wish i thought of that... how true.

And if they needed Football... why not Memphis instead of us? His words are
lame and don't hold any water.

_____

From: Bob Fancher [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Saturday, July 02, 2005 12:47 PM
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [UC Basketball] Re: Tranghese


Yeah, Richard, and if you believe the commissioner about the potential of
U.C.'s football program being one of the key reasons for entrance, then
maybe you can also explain the potential of Marquette and DePaul football
programs.

----- Original Message -----
From: richard l. kandell <mailto:address@hidden>
To: address@hidden
Sent: Saturday, July 02, 2005 12:37 PM
Subject: [UC Basketball] Re: Tranghese

Holy Crumpets Batman - the Commissioner of the new league says what? That
it was the rest of the BEast Presidents being comfortable with Zimpher, her
vision for the school and why UC wanted to move to their conference, as well
as the potential of the football team ("where we were hurt" in the loss of 3
schools) and the overall improvement in athletic facilities spearheaded by
Varsity Village (made possible primarily by Bob Goin), plus the market,
that were the key factors in evaluating UC and offering them admittance to
the BEast. Oh, and yes, by the way, the successful basketball program was a
plus, but we really didn't need any help there, thank you.

I'm not arguing that Huggins and the basketball program weren't also a key,
but to say, as some seem to be, that he was the only reason, or even the
lopsided most important reason, for UC being invited to the BEast, does not
appear to be correct.

Richard K.



To subscribe, please follow the instructions here.