INDEX BY:    DATE | THREAD | AUTHOR  

Max



From: jerry weinstein
Date: 01 Jul 2005 - 11:13 AM EST

Dan,

Hey, I don't see how saying I was taking your word on the 6 out of 9 (or whatever) was insinuating you were lying or misinformed. On the contrary, I was assuming you were correct for the purpose of discussion.

I think my point about jucos is pretty self evident: that his classes wouldn't have been rated nearly as high without them and that they tend to be overrated. The competition for jucos isn't nearly as great as it is for top high school players.

The root of all Huggins' problems here is his failure to recruit effectively at the high school level, which has caused him to take too many jucos (many of whom shouldn't have been here) and even some high schoolers who may have been highly rated but were not high quality kids.
Follow Ups:
Re: Max, jon breiner
RE: Max, Dan Marshall

To subscribe, please follow the instructions here.