RE: According to the Enquirer Editorial Board . . .

[Shinkle, Randy]

I might agree, except that this "editorial" shows no support for
Huggins.  The Enquirer, Zimpher and Cox (if not other UC trustees) are
clearly on the same page -- Huggins receives no credit for:
  - Maxiell's development
  - UC's entry into the Big East
  - the academic improvement of the basketball program
  - anything else of value
 
Randy '78
 
P.S. -- I quoted "editorial" above because I'm not sure that merely
echoing the obvious, the unanimous public support for Maxiell, qualifies
as an "opinion" worth noting.
 

 
  _____  

From: jon breiner [mailto:address@hidden 
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 9:40 AM
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [UC Basketball] According to the Enquirer Editorial Board .
. .


AT least this is the type of thing that can set up the "middle ground"
necessary to extend Huggins contract.
 
Jon
 
 

	----- Original Message ----- 
	From: Michael Ryan <mailto:address@hidden>  
	To: BB Forum <mailto:address@hidden>  
	Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 9:36 AM
	Subject: [UC Basketball] According to the Enquirer Editorial
Board . . .


	. . . . Cincinnati lost to Louisville a few months ago in the
NCAA tournament. 
	
http://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050701/EDIT01/5070
10371
	
	If they cant get this simple fact straight, how can they have a
qualified opinion on Coach Huggins' situation ?
	
	At least they got this part right - 
	"Maxiell, who is from Texas, came to Cincinnati to play for Bob
Huggins and the Bearcats."
	
	
	-- 
	Mike Ryan