Previous Message:
Interesting response on the enquirer article
Interesting response on the enquirer article
Next Message:
RE: Interesting response on the enquirer article
RE: Interesting response on the enquirer article
Re: Interesting response on the enquirer article
From: Jill Beitz
Date: 02 Jun 2005 - 03:36 PM EST
Date: 02 Jun 2005 - 03:36 PM EST
WOW. Makes me wish I could cancel my Enquirer subscription all over again.
J
2 Cert <address@hidden> wrote:
My letter to Paul Daugherty
Mr. Daugherty,
You did a good job of bringing up most everything about Mr. Cox except for
what this entire mess is about. While I agree with you that the examples you
gave does show how others in this area are stuck in the prejudice past, it
has nothing to do with why he decided to speak without thinking first. In
fact, the attitude he portrayed in his statement shows a prejudice portrayal
of UC athletes, especially black UC athletes! Do I think that?s what he
meant? No, but the bigger issue is how someone in such a high position at UC
can speak without thinking first. Reading that article again is mind
boggling to say the least!
His response.
Nope, the bigger issue is what the prez and the board think is best for the
U... thanks...PD
_________________________________________________________________
Don't just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!
http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/
---------------------------------
Discover Yahoo!
Find restaurants, movies, travel & more fun for the weekend. Check it out!
- References:
- Interesting response on the enquirer article
- From: 2 Cert
- Interesting response on the enquirer article
To subscribe, please follow the instructions here.


