Re: New ERA of UC-Ball

[Joe Adelhardt]

Anyone hear if Goodman might walk on to the bball team?

> From: old school <address@hidden>
> Reply-To: old school <address@hidden>
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [UC Basketball] New ERA of UC-Ball
> Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 16:20:13 -0400
>
> Hey is Patz a walk-on? =P
>
> On 5/3/05, Teeters, Matthew D (Matt) <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Patz is a walkon, so does not count toward the 13.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: A.K. G [mailto:address@hidden
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 2:40 PM
> > To: address@hidden
> > Subject: [UC Basketball] New ERA of UC-Ball
> >
> > As usual I am probably overly excited about these signing, but I really
> > beleive we are headed into a new era of UC basketball.  I think our
> > recruiting will only get better once we have established some success in
> > the
> > BEAST.  Honestly I think the only thing we need to shore up is our image
> >
> > locally.  It seems the Ohio kids don't want to come to cincy anymore.
> >
> > Other than that - we now have 4 solid frontline guys.  (Hicks, Harris?,
> > Johnson, McGowan) (not sure Herrera is ready yet)
> > 3 solid wings - (Kirk, White, Bright)
> > 3 shooters (Evans, Banks, Jihad)
> > 2 solid PG (assuming Devan is ready to go)
> >
> > Plus intangibles like Coleman, Patz, and ?Souly?
> >
> > I count 15 - is that right?
> > Don't we need to be at 13?  What am I missing here?  I thought we were 1
> >
> > over?
> >
> > AK
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Don't just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!
> > http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/
> >
> >