Re: New ERA of UC-Ball

[old school]

Hey is Patz a walk-on? =P

On 5/3/05, Teeters, Matthew D (Matt) <address@hidden> wrote:
> Patz is a walkon, so does not count toward the 13.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: A.K. G [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 2:40 PM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: [UC Basketball] New ERA of UC-Ball
>
> As usual I am probably overly excited about these signing, but I really
> beleive we are headed into a new era of UC basketball.  I think our
> recruiting will only get better once we have established some success in
> the
> BEAST.  Honestly I think the only thing we need to shore up is our image
>
> locally.  It seems the Ohio kids don't want to come to cincy anymore.
>
> Other than that - we now have 4 solid frontline guys.  (Hicks, Harris?,
> Johnson, McGowan) (not sure Herrera is ready yet)
> 3 solid wings - (Kirk, White, Bright)
> 3 shooters (Evans, Banks, Jihad)
> 2 solid PG (assuming Devan is ready to go)
>
> Plus intangibles like Coleman, Patz, and ?Souly?
>
> I count 15 - is that right?
> Don't we need to be at 13?  What am I missing here?  I thought we were 1
>
> over?
>
> AK
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Don't just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!
> http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/