INDEX BY:    DATE | THREAD | AUTHOR  
Previous Message:
RE: APR data released
Next Message:
RE: Worcester?

RE: Re: Interesting quote



From: Shinkle, Randy
Date: 02 Mar 2005 - 08:49 AM EST

I'm surprised there weren't more guesses on this one.

Coach K said this just this week, describing his team this year.

It'll be interesting to see how UC fares the rest of this year (and next
year?) without a "classic" point guard in the rotation.

Randy '78

P.S. -- When you consider that freshman Satterfield played the 2 spot in
HS, and how sophomore Logan's career turned out, one *might* suggest
that UC's 2000 team didn't have a "classic" point guard in the rotation.



-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Ryan [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 4:39 PM
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [UC Basketball] Re: Interesting quote

Dont know, but I'll guess Boeheim.

--
Mike Ryan


On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 16:20:43 -0500, Bart Neeb -ELMOS-NA-
<address@hidden> wrote:
The "other" Bob - Bob Knight?

---- Original Message ----

Interesting quote ...

From: Shinkle, Randy
Date: 01 Mar 2005 - 03:05 PM EST

"I don't think we have a point guard position. Because if we judge
somebody just as a point guard, we would judge them sometimes too
negatively and not look at the strengths a kid has. If you're saying,
'You're a point guard,' it'd be 'Why aren't you doing this? Why aren't
you leading here?' I think you're almost setting yourself up to fail."

Who said that?

Randy '78




To subscribe, please follow the instructions here.