Re: NCAA.

[MC72642]

In a message dated 3/1/2005 5:07:08 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
address@hidden writes:

I'm not  sure what to say - it just seems like a curious 
statement.  The  emphasis should still be on getting good kids 
that graduate (excepting  those who leave early to play 
professionally).  I guess I still want  to believe that 
college ball is about more then just Wins and  Losses.  That 
statement just seemed rather harsh, but maybe you're  just 
more realistic.




In the perfect world your way is the way it should be. In the real world  
Huggs wants to win. If his emphasis was on getting good kids that graduate he  
had to look no farther than Meeker. In the real world if a coach doesn't  win he 
gets fired no matter if every kid in his program graduates. I don't know  
about every school but while Huggs is at UC talent will come first and hope for  
the best on the rest. Don