Re: Bright Future

[Jason Kinney]

I think Saturday's game is a prime example of why Bright needs to play the 
"3". He is skilled enough offensively and to stick him at the "4" would 
limit his productivety.  The only thing he needs to work on offensively is 
his ball-handling.  He continues to remind me of Mickeal + the jump shot 
and - the ball-handling and defense.  My guess is that he improves both of 
the -'s and becomes a better player than Mickeal, maybe as soon as next 
year. (Provided he plays his natural "3" spot)
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "juckerrules" <address@hidden>
To: "basketball" <address@hidden>
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 10:29 AM
Subject: [UC Basketball] Bright Future


> I've been saying all season that I expect Roy Bright to have a significant 
> impact on this team's success.  So far, I haven't seen the level of play I 
> expected on a regular basis, although there have been tantalizing flashes 
> of his talent.  His shooting is better - take out his 3-pt attempts and 
> his % looks better, although he still needs to improve.  His rebounding is 
> 2nd only to Hicks (based on number of rebounds per minutes played).  I'm 
> hoping he can have a breakout game, maybe against Tulane, and build from 
> there - he will be necessary in the tourney, especially with no Chad Moore 
> to fill any minutes at guard, meaning White or Kirkland will need to play 
> more there to spell Williams.
> Bright needs to improve his D as well, but I still think he will make a 
> difference in one of the conference tourney games - for good or ill 
> remains to be seen.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced search. Learn more.