Re: NCAA.

[MC72642]

In a message dated 3/1/2005 11:08:48 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
address@hidden writes:

> I  would lose a scholarship over playing a second rated 
player who would  graduate.

I CAN'T BELIEVE YOU SAID THAT!!!!!

I don't want to get  personal but wow - why even bother 
following college sports?  This  kind of attitude kills 
(killed?) the game.  That's all I'll say,  but... Wow...

Jon



Where have you been? UC has only been doing exactly that forever. You don't  
think they could have got a player with at least average or  better basketball 
skills with good academics that would probably graduate  instead of Banks, 
Philgram, Whaley, and a ton of other guys in the past. Like  I've said before UC 
has to take chances on guys like that to get the talent they  do. It's all 
right with me because I want to see a top 25 team and if that's  what it takes 
go for it. Actually some of these guys do work out and graduate so  it's not 
all bad. I think you overreacted because you are usually pretty sharp  on most 
things. Don't even think about telling me you would give Paswalllly or  someone 
like him a scholarship because I wouldn't believe you. Ha  Don