RE: No more Moore

[Andy LaCombe]

I think he does not have to cost them an athletic scholarship.  How would
they bring back players in their operation recall program?  Since he is no
longer going to be able to play, I would think that the university has some
flexibility on how to finance his "scholarship" outside of the 13 that can
be given out to "players".

-----Original Message-----
From: Jon Macomber [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 10:54 AM
To: address@hidden
Subject: RE: [UC Basketball] No more Moore


Just guessing, but I assume Moore was on the accelerated 3
year graduation.  Like Field, Flowers, Little, Stokes, etc.
I know that's been a big emphasis recently - get the guys
through academically ASAP (Duke style).

If he would happen to finish over the summer would his
scholarship be free and clear?  That sounds like
an "everybody win" scenario, but I'm not sure.  Regardless
it's good that he's gonna stay and finish school.

Also, I think if he's on the bench in street clothes that
will dispell any rumors of friction with Huggs.  Wonder if
he'll travel with the team.

Jon

---- Original message ----
> Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 07:33:59 -0500
> From: "Holdheide, Brad" <address@hidden>
> Subject: RE: [UC Basketball] No more Moore
> To: "'address@hidden'" <address@hidden>
>
> If Devan Downey has been following the Bearcats closely this
year he has to
> be salivating with excitement.  No more Chad Moore ...
Muhammed a bust ...
> that leave the PG spot all to him next year.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Hall [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 8:05 PM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [UC Basketball] No more Moore
>
>
> I doubt Huggins would do this, but it would be neat if Chadd
got to suit
> up for the Tulane game and make a token appearance at the
end. Give the
> fans a chance to show their appreciation.
>
> If he's on the bench the students should chant his name
until Huggs puts
> him in!
>
> 			- John in Mn
>
>
> On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, jon breiner wrote:
>
> > Good luck Chadd!  It's been fun and while I will miss
seeing you become
> the
> > PG I thought you would, I enjoyed seeing you give it
everything you could
> to
> > help my favorite team succeed.  Thanks!
> >
> > Jon
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Keith Wedinger"
<address@hidden>
> > To: <address@hidden>
> > Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 7:29 PM
> > Subject: Re: [UC Basketball] No more Moore
> >
> >
> > > I cannot fault Chadd Moore at all for stepping down.
Chronic back
> > > pain and the rigors of basketball simply do not mix.  I
wish him the
> > > very best in his continued educational pursuits at UC.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 19:26:59 EST, address@hidden
> > > <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > > Every team losses players but the Bearcats just seem to
have that cloud
> > > > hanging over them the past couple years. Players that
should have been
> > > > here and
> > > > contributing this year.
> > > >
> > > > Robert Whaley
> > > > Mike Pilgrim
> > > > Vincent Banks
> > > > Chadd Moore
> > > >
> > > > We can always wonder "What-If." How different would this
team have been
> > > > with
> > > > these guys on the team, healthy, getting with the
program (that's a big
> > > > if),
> > > > and contributing? If everything had gone exactly like we
would have
> > > > wanted,
> > > > I think the Cats would have 1, maybe 2 losses this year.
I would beat
> > > > these  4
> > > > guys, if all went perfect, would have garnished 30 to
40% of the UC
> > > > minutes
> > > > this year.
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Keith Wedinger
> > > Bearcatnews.com
> > > Sciotofootball.com