Previous Message:
Re: Hicks is our new Kenyon!
Re: Hicks is our new Kenyon!
Next Message:
Re: Finally agree with something Lavin said....
Re: Finally agree with something Lavin said....
Re: Wake v. Louisville?
From: Brent Wyrick
Date: 02 Feb 2005 - 11:49 PM EST
Date: 02 Feb 2005 - 11:49 PM EST
Wake, based on play at the point and overall skill at every position IMO.
----- Original Message -----
From: "A.K. G" <address@hidden>
To: <address@hidden>
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 10:07 PM
Subject: [UC Basketball] Wake v. Louisville?
As frustrating as this loss is, someone had a good point earlier....wehave
lost to the #1, #4, and #9(twice) so I guess we are right where we shouldbe
#20-something in the ranking. Other than the IU game UC has played prettyor
tough in these games and we are rolling teams we should beat. Believe it
not I have more confidence in this team that teams in the past. Iactually
thought AK-47 played a good game (other than FT's obviously)...Jihad wasusual...and
atrocious...Max had his moments....HICKS was a big game stud as
Nick really struggled with his shot (but I did like how he attacked thef$%k
basket a few times and got to the line).
Who would win between Wake and Louisville? I'm starting to think that
Pitino might have himself an elite team.firing
Also does the ville play anyone down the stretch or will they in all
likleyhood win-out? I think we will see them again in the conference USA
tourney - where is that this year?
AK
From: Justin Tubbs <address@hidden>
Reply-To: address@hidden
To: address@hidden, Keith Wedinger <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: [UC Basketball] Huggins is not down on his team
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 19:28:48 -0800 (PST)
Unfortunately, I don't think that this team will ever be capable of
ofon all cylinders. Kirkland needs to play with a sense of urgency and not
look like a deer in headlights for us to beat a quality opponent. Jihad
also needs to make better decisions, too bad chadd is hurt because we
looked pretty good when he came in the game in the first half. For the
most part they do play hard but let up at times and that is very obvious.
Seems like our guys have ADD or something. It really looks like they
forget what they are supposed to do in games offensively, look very out
sync.
Justin
Keith Wedinger <address@hidden> wrote:
From Huggins:
We are a good team, we are not a very good team.
We don't make plays in crucial situations. We miss layups, we miss
shots. We've got to get some people to finish plays. We played hard,
we are not down on the guys.
Ditto to Jon...if we can get the team to hit on all cylinders all at
once, UC can be very good.
--
Keith Wedinger
Bearcatnews.com
Sciotofootball.com
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'
_________________________________________________________________
FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar - get it now!
http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/
- References:
- Wake v. Louisville?
- From: A.K. G
- Wake v. Louisville?
To subscribe, please follow the instructions here.


