RE: Experts have UC at 17

[Mike Denman]

But they do NOT have a true center, so rating them somewhere between 17-25 is probably accurate. "What could have been" is pointless speculation at this point, IMO.

I'm fairly certain Pilgrim didn't leave. He was asked to leave...

-----Original Message-----
From: Phil Carmen [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 8:46 PM
To: address@hidden
Subject: RE: [UC Basketball] Experts have UC at 17


I don't think UC is overrated at all.  Imagine if they only had a true 
center, like if Whaley would have worked out.  Then Max would be able to 
open up and he wouldn't get double teamed down low or take on the 
responsibility of taking on the other team's big man.  UC would be top 5-10 
team for sure with a true center.  Even though UC is short and one of their 
tallest players is on the wing, they are one of the top 5 teams in block 
shots a game.  My prediction: UC will upset Loserville.  By the way, I think 
Pilgrim would of had been one of the first people off the bench and probably 
would have played more than Bright.  Did he ever say why he left?
--Phil


> From: address@hidden
> Reply-To: address@hidden
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: [UC Basketball] Experts have UC at 17
> Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 20:17:21 EST
>
> The experts on ESPN half time show have UC at 17. They must see something I
> don't. It sure looks good anyway. Don

_________________________________________________________________
On the road to retirement? Check out MSN Life Events for advice on how to 
get there! http://lifeevents.msn.com/category.aspx?cid=Retirement