Previous Message:
Re: Downey
Re: Downey
Next Message:
RE: Huggins
RE: Huggins
RE: Huggins
From: Dan Marshall
Date: 03 Jan 2005 - 09:47 AM EST
Date: 03 Jan 2005 - 09:47 AM EST
I agree the illlini were not 22pts better.
We hit our average in FT's and it's a 10 pt game. We hit under our
average but just a little higher on our shooting and it's within 5
.
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Denman [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 12:46 AM
To: address@hidden
Subject: RE: [UC Basketball] Huggins
"Illinois talent wise is not 22 points better than UC"
I will humbly disagree with this statement. This is exactly the problem
with the Cats IMO. They simply do not have the depth of talent that
Illinois (or any other top-10) team has. I've been saying to everyone
around me this year. We're not a bad team. We'll contend for a
conference title, but we probably will not it take it that far, because
we lack a depth of talent.
-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2005 10:31 AM
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [UC Basketball] Huggins
In a message dated 1/1/2005 10:17:26 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
address@hidden writes:
I saw an article that said Huggins had a closed door meeting with the
team for an hour after the game. That is why he missed the show. They
talked about life in general, he said, but wouldn't go into details
because it was something that needed to stay in house. Personally, I
think he did the right thing with sitting them down and talking it all
out last night.
The only thing I can say to that is maybe he should have had that talk
before the game! Illinois talent wise is not 22 points better than UC.
Huggins has
got to make these guys realize that against good teams they aren't
going to
score many points in the paint. They have to become a better passing
team to
get some good looks from outside. Something like Illinois did last
night. Don
To subscribe, please follow the instructions here.


