INDEX BY:    DATE | THREAD | AUTHOR  

Re: Rotations



From: Brian Johnson
Date: 03 Nov 2004 - 04:03 PM EST

There was also the Laettner shot vs. UConn where he
inbounded the ball, no one was gaurding him, and all
the guy did was toss the ball back to him, as he had,
and buried, the open shot.
--- Bryan Sherman <address@hidden> wrote:

Wasn't one of the key criticisms of KY after the
Laetner miracle shot
that they *didn't* guard the guy inbounding the
ball?

I am not a coach, nor have I played one on TV, but I
think having a
tall guy challenging you inbounding the ball makes
it difficult to get
the ball to the spot you want. If you don't put a
man on the guy
inbounding, he has better vision of the court and
you don;t have
someone cutting his angles. Just a thought.


On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 14:20:21 -0500, Michael W Pickens
<address@hidden> wrote:
If you can't get the ball across mid-court or
inbounds your height advantage
isn't going to help you. This leads me to another
question. Why do teams
guard the inbounder. Why not guard 5 on 4?





__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page.
www.yahoo.com


Follow Ups:
RE: Rotations, dfairchild

To subscribe, please follow the instructions here.