INDEX BY:    DATE | THREAD | AUTHOR  
Previous Message:
RE: Rotations
Next Message:
RE: Rotations

Re: Rotations



From: Bryan Sherman
Date: 03 Nov 2004 - 03:47 PM EST

Wasn't one of the key criticisms of KY after the Laetner miracle shot
that they *didn't* guard the guy inbounding the ball?

I am not a coach, nor have I played one on TV, but I think having a
tall guy challenging you inbounding the ball makes it difficult to get
the ball to the spot you want. If you don't put a man on the guy
inbounding, he has better vision of the court and you don;t have
someone cutting his angles. Just a thought.


On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 14:20:21 -0500, Michael W Pickens <address@hidden> wrote:
If you can't get the ball across mid-court or inbounds your height advantage
isn't going to help you. This leads me to another question. Why do teams
guard the inbounder. Why not guard 5 on 4?
Follow Ups:
Re: Rotations, Brian Johnson

To subscribe, please follow the instructions here.