RE: HUGGS

[Andy LaCombe]

UCLA was one of the most talented teams in the country that year, I do not
think it was luck but them finally having something to play for.  They were,
I believe, ranked as high as #4 that year.  Not bad for a 8/9 seed ;-) 

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Johnson [mailto:address@hidden 
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 3:40 PM
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [UC Basketball] HUGGS

Also, in Logan's case, he was matched up against a 6-6 guy.  Stokes
certainly did his best to compensate for that mismatch (39 pts).  The UCLA
loss is certainly one that can be attributed to pure luck.  They made a lot
of crazy shots in that one.

I was disappointed that Satt stayed for two seasons, but not disappointed at
all in his productivity during those two years.
--- Keith Wedinger <address@hidden> wrote:

> Have to disagree about Kenny Satterfield.  I think he was the last 
> true PG we had.  BTW, his last season with UC was the last time UC 
> made it past the 2nd round.  Coincidence?  I think not.
>
> On Mon, 2 Aug 2004 14:26:10 -0500 , Harris, Derek C 
> <address@hidden> wrote:
> > I would have to agree with that statement.
> > Huggins has recruited to many combo guards to play PG in college.  
> > Nick Willims, Kenny Satterfield, Steve Logan, Chadd Moore.  All were 
> > combo PG's or Shoot First PG's.  I could only imagine if Logan would 
> > of had another reliable 3 point shooter on his team or a PG who 
> > could break down the defense off the dribble.
> > Guard play wins National Championships.. We have had many good 
> > guards, but we have not had a true PG and a solid 2 guard in many 
> > years.
> > D/Taylor Mill



		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail