Previous Message:
RE: Whaley
RE: Whaley
Next Message:
Re: Whaley
Re: Whaley
Re: Whaley
From: bob
Date: 02 Aug 2004 - 08:48 AM EST
Date: 02 Aug 2004 - 08:48 AM EST
I agree! Keep in mind, it doesn't take a whole lot to maintain academically. I don't know Rob's schedule, but I'm willing to bet there isn't an engineering degree in his future. In fact, from what I've seen posted here in the past, most basketball players that do obtain a degree, seem to gravitate toward "criminal justice", which leads me to believe it's not the most rigorous curriculum at the University level. If you can't maintain a passing grade level with the watered-down academics of many athletes, amid the plethora of tutoring and academic services at their disposal, you're either not trying very hard or have problems so extensive that college is probably not the place to be in order to overcome them. (I apologize to those real student-athletes, and there are many, for whom sport is a means to assist them in getting an education and meaningful degree in preparation for their life's work).
Michael W Pickens <address@hidden> wrote:
Nothing personal but I'm sick and tired of the "give the guy a second chance crap". What in Whaley's history tells you that he deserves a second, third or fourth chance. I can't imagine the steps UC and the Athletic department have gone through to help keep Whaley eligible for this season. As a regular student you wouldn't have been given anything close to the help he is getting. Just because he is tall and talented we should keep him. I think this team is much better off without a lazy center. I know he is going to have lots of trouble getting the job done but give Soulman a chance. He struggles this year and then maybe his Junior and Senior season he becomes a force in the middle. I would rather struggle some and watch a hustling team like UAB last year then a lazy team that has tons of talent but just squeaks by. Just my two cents.
"In The Know" <address@hidden>
08/01/2004 05:41 PM Please respond to
address@hidden
To
<address@hidden> cc
Subject
Re: [UC Basketball] Whaley
Hopefully - I think Huggs will realize Whaley is doing everything he can and
working hard (hopefully he is) and do whats best for the team - bring the
guy we need back.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brian Johnson" <address@hidden>
To: <address@hidden>
Sent: Sunday, August 01, 2004 2:50 PM
Subject: RE: [UC Basketball] Whaley
There's obviously more to this than simply Rob's
coursework that doesn't see the newspapers, or even
the UC forums. I don't necessarily disagree with
Goin's stance (even Oscar has basically declared Rob a
lost cause), but shouldn't this be Huggs' decision
when he comes back?
--- Michael Ryan <address@hidden> wrote:
Just to follow up - this blurb was in this mornings
Enq.
UC center Robert Whaley is expected to return to
Cincinnati this month
to complete the academic work he needs to be
eligible to play in
2004-05, but don't expect to see him in a UC uniform
next winter even if
he is cleared academically.
Goin said two weeks ago that he was "considering
moving on without him"
and nothing has happened since then to change his
mind. Whaley averaged
5.8 points and 2.5 rebounds last season after an
All-American career at
Barton County (Kan.) Community College.
Without the 6-foot-10 Whaley, the Bearcats will
field a team with no
player taller than 6-8. The only true center will be
redshirt freshman
Asrangue Souleymane, a raw talent from the Central
African Republic who
remains in the early development stages.
Mike Ryan
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Seger
[mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 8:16 PM
To: address@hidden
Subject: [UC Basketball] Whaley
You guys should stop worrying or thinking about
Whaley. He will not be
on the team this year. Repeat - he will not be on
the team this year.
Mark
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!
- References:
- Re: Whaley
- From: Michael W Pickens
- Re: Whaley
To subscribe, please follow the instructions here.


