Re: Pilgrim in, Whaley out

[B M]

I thought most players went to summer school. And if Whaley does, he will be eligible.
 
So whats the big deal ? Why do they say he's "not on the roster" ?
 
Is there a roster when the team doesnt play or practice ?
 
Did he lose his scholarship ?
 
Is this a motivating tool ?
 


jon breiner <address@hidden> wrote:
Re: Whaley. Well, making up 3 credits during the summer is VERY easy, IF
you are there.

In the summer there are 3 3-week sessions, the quarter term, and 2
half-sessions. The first 3-week session is done and the second one is
starting next week I believe. Only the 2nd and 3rd 3-week sessions and the
second half session are options. I don't think there are many 2nd half
options, so he is limiting himself greatly at this point.

But why is this not surprising?

As for Pilgrim, I am very pleased to see he did what was necessary. I have
withheld judgment on him, and now I will judge him with high marks. Anyone
who takes care of business like that gets my props!


Jon




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "bob" 
To: "basketball" 
Sent: Saturday, July 10, 2004 7:19 AM
Subject: [UC Basketball] Pilgrim in, Whaley out


> The Enquirer is reporting that Pilgrim is elegible and back on the squad,
while Whaley is 3 credits short and is ineligible (although he could make up
those 3 credits in summer school and become elegible). Pilgrim is good
news - I'm not sure if Whaley's inelegibility is good or bad news - might be
better if he just went away based on past performance.
> http://www.enquirer.com/bearcats/2004/07/10/uc1pilg.html
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com