RE: Sylvester

[address@hidden]

Actually Joey, "got what they deserved" is partially what some of us
mean.  Look at the development of players at the other schools you
mentioned (OSU, X) versus UC. Do you think it is an accident that
Huggins has a huge number of players who develop their skills enough to
play professionally (NBA, CBA, overseas etc)?  

Do I think that most of these guys would have a better chance at
developing the pro-quality strength and skills at UC?  Yep.

On another note:
BTW - sure the big ten plays a "tough schedule", I have found though
that big ten people are usually remarkably impressed with the big ten.
The ACC didn't look very impressed or very intimidated!                

-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden 
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 10:11 AM
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [UC Basketball] Sylvester

much like how tOSU fans have the "pleasure" of watching UC football when
it's 
on tv. I would not consider basketball Ohio State's premier sport even
though 
they went to the final four in 1999 and they play a much tougher
schedule 
than UC ( I know I am beating a dead horse with the schedule thing), but
we all 
know UC's football team is nothing to write home about either.  Big deal
you 
lost Matt and Jamar to tOSU, Josh Duncan is going to Xavier thats the
way it 
goes sometimes.  Ohio State lost 3 recruits for football last year on
signing 
day.  I just think it is a waste of time to complain about kids that got
away and 
when they play poorley to make it sound like they got what they deserved
for 
not coming to UC, well thats not right.-joey