Previous Message:
Re: Sylvester
Re: Sylvester
Next Message:
RE: Sylvester
RE: Sylvester
Re: Sylvester
From: jon breiner
Date: 04 Dec 2003 - 11:13 AM EST
Date: 04 Dec 2003 - 11:13 AM EST
to clarify, I was celebrating. :)
Seriously, I prefer seeing them not do so well when they go elsewhere as it makes me feel better about "losing" them. When they are Cincy guys who go elsewhere, I feel better with an added little tingle. My wife thinks I should go to the doctor as it should not be causing a tingle. I cannot explain it other than simply relate that it happens.
As for Sylvester, based on his current level of improvement, he'd see little to no playing time on this year's UC team and I did not expect that when he went to OSU. I have no explanation for his lack of improvement, only (like my tingle) that it exists.
As for the schedule thing, other than this year, UC usually plays a very tough OOC schedule, but has issues when it comes to conference strength. OSU plays in a better conference, but that is ending shortly so looking into the future, the point is moot.
jon b
address@hidden wrote:
Sorry, have to respond to this one...
much like how tOSU fans have the "pleasure" of watching UC football when it's on tv. I would not consider basketball Ohio State's premier sport even though they went to the final four in 1999 and they play a much tougher schedule than UC ( I know I am beating a dead horse with the schedule thing),
According to what was Ohio State's schedule "much tougher" than UC's? One RPI site I saw had UC #9 and OSU #17, Sagarin had it
UC #36 and OSU #27. Sounds pretty close to me.
but we all know UC's football team is nothing to write home about either.
Yeah, OSU has killed them in the last two games haven't they? That
is only a comment to say that UC's football team is not where I would like to see it, but they can play.
Big deal you lost Matt and Jamar to tOSU, Josh Duncan is going to Xavier thats the way it goes sometimes. Ohio State lost 3 recruits for football last year on signing day. I just think it is a waste of time to complain about kids that got away and when they play poorley to make it sound like they got what they deserved for not coming to UC, well thats not right.-joey
My point was that it is funny how these things work out when players go to one school over another, for whatever reason, and they do not
perform up to expectations. Huggs has a proven track record of developing players into the best that they can be. I do not know about other coaches, but I do follow former UC recruits to see how they do. Mine was an observation more than a celebration over their misfortune. You can take it however you want, but do not presume to know what I meant and then come down on me for it. Mine was a shot at those that felt Huggs lost players that he should have gotten from the Cincy area, when maybe Huggs chose the "right" player for UC in the first place.
Andy
- Follow Ups:
- RE: Sylvester, Mike Denman
- References:
- Re: Sylvester
- From: alacombe
- Re: Sylvester
To subscribe, please follow the instructions here.


