RE: Now here's the question:

[bob]

Keeping X is a no-brainer, but let's not get carried away with scheduling the entire top 25!  Winning will be difficult enough in the conference - the days of 31-4 are way gone!  We need to schedule a few "cupcakes", or at least very beatable teams to balance out a steady diet of Z, UConn, Syracuse, Pitt, Louisville, Marquette et. al.

"Harris, Derek C" <address@hidden> wrote:I agree with keeping Memphis, Xavier, Wake Forest,
and somewhat agree with Dayton, but I would love
to see us play an established SEC team (Kentucky,
Florida, Georgia, etc...or a Big Twelve team...
Oklahoma, Okla St, Texas. With all the kids from
Texas on our team and how hard Huggs recruits
the area, I'm sure they would love to play us every
year. I just get sick and tired of people saying
we don't play anybody. No we can finally say we
play in the best basketball conference in America 
and still have a great non conference schedule to 
match.
Derek 

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Johnson [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 4:31 PM
To: address@hidden
Subject: [UC Basketball] Now here's the question:


Most reports I've seen point to an 18-game conference
season. With nine OOC games, and assuming five
pushovers, which OOC rivals do you wish to maintain?

My list: Memphis (every year), Xavier (every year),
Wake Forest (every year), rotate Charlotte and Dayton
every other year.

I'd like to hear some feedback here!


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree


---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard