INDEX BY:    DATE | THREAD | AUTHOR  
Previous Message:
RE: Re: The new BE
Next Message:
RE: Re: The new BE

Re: Re: The new BE



From: Brian Johnson
Date: 13 Oct 2003 - 10:53 AM EST

HOLY DUPLICATION OF E-MAIL MESSAGES, BATMAN! ;-)

--- jon breiner <address@hidden> wrote:
I agree that BC is a big loss, but their fball
program has been consistently
good, but not really great. They are a good fit for
the ACC and what they
want, and given a choice, I would take BC over USF
in a heartbeat, but from
UC's perspective, I'd rather have Syracuse.

Question about ND: Does anyone think they will
regain their Lou Holtz days
of success? Personally, I do not think they can do
it as an independent. I
wonder how they would feel about a BE fball
conference that eventually went
to 12 teams, and fielded two 6 team divisions. You
play the other 5 within
your division and 1 crossover game that rotates.
That would be only 6 conf.
games. Would something like that be worth it if ND
said they'd do it? Ok,
so now I am thinking crazy stuff, but why not! ;-)

jon b


----- Original Message -----
From: "Rands, William (randswj)"
<address@hidden>
To: <address@hidden>;
<address@hidden>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 10:12 AM
Subject: RE: [UC Football] The new BE


I think BC is a big loss. It has good name
recognition in fb, is in a
great
market, and has a strong reputation for
academics.It has some cachet.Syr,
WVU & Pitt all have good fb history, but WVU & Syr
are way down
recently.The
new BE will not be an impressive fb conference. Oh
well.

Like everybody, I think USF is probably next in
line.
Bill


-----Original Message-----
From: jon breiner [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 9:16 AM
To: address@hidden;
address@hidden
Subject: [UC Football] The new BE


Well, with BC going to the ACC, I guess it is for
sure UC is going to the
new BE. Who will join UL and UC? I figure USF
based on media reports,
but
would be interested in other thoughts? How do you
think the divisions
would
break down in bball? I still think this will be
the best basketball
conference in the US.

As for fball, the talk lately has been to include
more conferences in the
BCS. I read somewhere that if the BE is not part
of the BCS, the BCS
would
no longer have the majority of Div I schools, so
it seems "they" need the
BE. With Syracuse, Pitt, etc. the BCS inclusion
can be justified, even if
it is the "worst" of the included conferences.

So for me, BC leaving is not a huge surprise and
does not bother me as
much
as if it had been Syracuse, for instance.

jon b



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com

To subscribe, please follow the instructions here.