RE: Jamar Butler scenario

[Brian Johnson]

Not to disagree with either of you, but it's all
between Jamar and Huggs.  I understand that it's fun
to speculate, but why don't we just leave the issue
between the two of them.
--- Brad Holdheide <address@hidden> wrote:
> Backing off Jamar for ANY reason is a mistake IMO
> and likely never happened.
> Jamar is likely going to be a great player and is a
> local Ohio kid who
> wanted to be a Bearcat his whole life (tongue in
> cheek).....so WHY would you
> do anything to jeopardize his verbal commitment.
>
> I'd say Jamar backed out, UC didn't.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Peterson
> [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 2:14 PM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: [UC Basketball] Jamar Butler scenario
>
>
> So what do you all think of this scenario regarding
> Jamar Butler.
>
> Bearcat staff finds out there is a strong possibilty
> that Isaiah Swann will 
> commit if he is told he can play the one (there is a
> report on the 
> recruiting page that he will commit to a school
> where he can play the one).
>
> Staff brings this up with Jamar and asks if he will
> consider playing the 2. 
> Jamar wants to play the point. Meanwhile Terwilliger
> and OSU are telling 
> Jamar he can play the point.
>
> Staff starts looking for a relacement for Jamar
> should he consider going 
> elsewhere and find Vincent Banks willing to commit.
>
> Jamar Decommits, opening door for Swann.
>
> Just some thoughts...But if the staff can land Swann
> and get a similar 
> player to replace Butler, it could turn out to be a
> really good class.
>
> But when are they going to land a center...
>
> Chris Peterson
_________________________________________________________________
> Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months
> FREE*.  
> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com