Re: Yet another conference scenario

[richard l. kandell]

Assume for the sake of discussion that the teams listed on the football side
of the article are correct.  What does Xavier "add" by its inclusion on the
basketball side.  Not talking smack or making any other derogatory remarks,
but if you include UC you have complete involvement in the Cincinnati media
market - why would you "need" "X"?  If you were willing to go as far west as
Milwaukee to get Marquette, why not add a DePaul (Chicago) or St. Louis (St.
Louis) instead of a second team in Cincinnati?  "X" may have a little better
record over the past several years than the other 2, but otherwise, what is
it they add?

Richard K.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Wedinger, Keith" <address@hidden>
To: <address@hidden>
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 7:08 AM
Subject: [UC Basketball] Yet another conference scenario


> Check out this story from the Cincy Enquirer:
> http://www.enquirer.com/editions/2003/06/06/spt_bigeast.rtf.html
> <http://www.enquirer.com/editions/2003/06/06/spt_bigeast.rtf.html>
>
> This proposal has some merit.  And I certainly wouldn't mind having the XU
> game mean more than just bragging rights.
>
> J. Keith Wedinger
> Senior Software Developer
> Sterling Commerce