RE: Whaley arrested

[Shinkle, Randy]

I was saying that this was not a new, recent incident separate from what happened in February.

Randy '78


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brad Holdheide [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2003 12:45 PM
> To: 'address@hidden'
> Subject: RE: [UC Basketball] Whaley arrested
>
>
> "My main point is, this is not *another* incident."
>
> Like it or not this IS another incident.  Getting arrested, 
> even if found
> not guilty, puts a blemish on your program.  My main concern 
> is even if he
> was breaking up a fight why is he hanging around with people 
> who get into
> fights.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shinkle, Randy [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2003 11:31 AM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: RE: [UC Basketball] Whaley arrested
>
>
> This is not "new" news, other than the arrest; see:
>
>     http://www.cincypost.com/2003/02/18/ucbrite02-18-2003.html
>
> Everyone on the Barton County side of the issue concluded 
> that Whaley was
> trying to break up a fight.  Now, 3 months later, folks on 
> the Garden City
> side have determined that Whaley was an active participant.
>
> Which is the truth?  We shall see.  However, there's a *long* 
> way to go
> before anyone can say that Whaley was at fault anymore than 
> Eric Hicks was
> when he got shot in the leg.
>
> My main point is, this is not *another* incident.
>
> Randy '78
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2003 11:02 AM
> > To: address@hidden
> > Subject: [UC Basketball] Whaley arrested
> >
> >
> > The CBC could be haunting us again.....
> >
> > http://www.enquirer.com/midday/05/05082003_Sports_whaley07.rtf
> > _Late.html
> >
> >
> > Chris