Re: Re: Conference Affiliations

[richard l. kandell]

Still think it would be better than what we have now - & the Syracuse AD is
being quoted to the effect that if Miami goes Syracuse is going too, so the
likelihood is that, along with BC, if anyone leaves, all 3 will go.  An
all-sports (or virtually all sports conference) with UC, UofL, Memphis,
Pitt, W. Va., and Va. Tech as the foundation has to be better than something
that includes USF, TCU and Marquette and the geography that goes with it.

Richard K.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Zuke" <address@hidden>
Newsgroups: uc.bearcats
To: <address@hidden>
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2003 9:28 AM
Subject: Re: [UC Basketball] Re: Conference Affiliations


> In article <address@hidden>,
> richard l. kandell <address@hidden> wrote:
> > I thought that Temple had been given it's walking papers with respect to
its
> > inclusion in the BE for football, and don't they play in the A-10 for
hoops?
> > Pitt & W. Va are attractive from a geographic standpoint, even Va Tech,
and
> > along with UofL and Memphis represent as close to a cohesive geographic
>
> Color it as we might, the loss of BC, Syracuse and Miami makes the
> Big East with our three schools added look like a Metro Conference.
> If those three schools go to the ACC, UC's
> chances for a decent league affiliation just waved bye-bye.
>
> Later,
>
> Zuke
> -- 
> You are in control until you are out of control.