Re: RPI Projections

[Zuke]

In article <address@hidden>,
Keith Wedinger <address@hidden> wrote:
> I can believe this.  One has to consider:

I can believe it but we could conceivably have three more losses
by next Thursday.  That's the scary part.  If we win the next three
and then lose in the semi's I'll take that seven or eight.

Later,

Zuke

> 1.  UC has a very strong schedule
> 2.  UC has beaten 3 teams that at the time were in the top 10 of the RPI
> 3.  The teams UC has lost to are not slouches.  Granted, most of us =
> consider
> the losses to DePaul, SLU and Charlotte to be unacceptable but none of =
> these
> are bad teams.
> 4.  Margin of victory/loss is not considered at all by the RPI or by the
> NCAA selection committee.  A one point win is every bit as good as a 30
> point win.  Style points don't count.
>
> J. Keith Wedinger=20
> Senior Software Developer=20
> Sterling Commerce=20
> =20
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Seger [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 3:15 PM
> To: 'address@hidden'
> Subject: [UC Basketball] RPI Projections
>
> The new RPI seedings are out.  They have UC listed as a #7 seed.
> Unbelievable.  For comparison, the other #7s are California, Purdue and
> Missouri.
> =20
> Marquette is a 2, and both Louisville and Memphis are 5 seeds.
> =20
> Sincerely,
> =20
> Mark J. Seger
> Managing Director
> Ultimus Fund Solutions, LLC
> =20
> =20


-- 
You are in control until you are out of control.